Family law proceedings encompass actions for divorce, paternity, post- divorce/paternity decree actions, and litigation involving custody of a child or child support. Sadly, domestic violence is also often an issue in family law proceedings. Below is an account of the impact domestic violence has on different aspects of family law.
Domestic violence does not have an impact on the property distribution in a proceeding for divorce in Arizona. Arizona is a no-fault divorce state, which means that the Court cannot consider the behavior of one or both spouses in granting a divorce. Instead, the Court will grant a divorceif the marriage is irretrievably broken, and the distribution of property proceeds in accordance with the principles of community property law. The concept of community property is premised on the idea that property acquired by the community is owned equally by the spouses, and that the community property is therefore subject to an equitable (usually equal) division at divorce. Domestic violence, adultery, and other fault-based concepts are not considered in the property distribution at divorce.
Domestic violence is also not a factor in determining if a spouse is entitled to an award of spousal maintenance. Spousal maintenance in Arizona is governed under A.R.S. 25-319. A spouse must meet at least one of the qualifications enumerated in Part A of the statute in order to be considered for a maintenance award. The qualifications in Part A do not include domestic violence and are instead focused on the ability of the spouse to be self-supporting, contributions to the education of the other spouse, and the length of the marriage.
However, in the event that a victim of domestic violence meets one of the threshold requirements for spousal maintenance listed in A.R.S. 25-319(A), domestic violence may be considered by the Court in determining the amount and duration of the award of maintenance. A.R.S. 25-219(B)(13) allows the Court to consider "[a]ll actual damages and judgment from conduct that results in criminal conviction of either spouse in which the other spouse or child was the victim." Therefore, if the domestic violence charges result in a conviction, the domestic violence may be relevant in determining the amount/duration of the spousal maintenance award.
Domestic violence is relevant in cases involving the custody of a child. A.R.S. 25-403.03 states that "joint custody shall not be awarded if the court makes a finding of the existence of significant domestic violence pursuant to section 13-3601 or if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a significant history of domestic violence." Domestic violence is presumptively against the best interests of the child, as a history of domestic violence clearly impacts the safety and well-being of the child. In order to determine if significant domestic violence has occurred so that an award of joint legal custody is inappropriate, the Court must consider all relevant factors, including findings from other courts, police reports, medical reports, reports generated by CPS or a domestic violence shelter, witness accounts, and school records. See A.R.S. 25-403.03.
If the Court determines that a parent committed an act of violence against the other parent, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of custody to the perpetrator is against the child's best interests (provided that both parents have not committed acts of domestic violence). A.R.S. 25-403.03. For purposes of this statutes, domestic violence is defined as "[i]ntentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes or attempts to cause sexual assault or serious physical injury"; acting in a manner that "[p]laces a person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious physical injury to any person;" or engaging "in a pattern of behavior for which a court may issue an ex parte order to protect the other parent who is seeking child custody or to protect the child and the child's siblings." A.R.S. 25-403.03. The statute also enumerates factors that may allow the perpetrator parent to rebut the presumption against joint legal custody.
Domestic violence also impacts parenting time between the children and the perpetrating parent. If a parent is found to have committed an act of domestic violence, that parent has the burden or proving "that parenting time will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child's emotional development" prior to spending time with the child. A.R.S. 25-403.03. The Court may also impose restrictions associated with the parenting time, such as requiring that the parenting time be supervised by a neutral party, that exchanges of the child be supervised, drug/alcohol testing, or counseling.
Finally, domestic violence is not a consideration in determining the child support obligation. Instead, child support depends on the respective monthly gross incomes of the parties, the amount of time spent with the children, and other factors such as the payment of medical insurance for the children and daycare expenses.